O
Richmond
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock surveillance

Richmond

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (12)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 14, 2026.

Public comments (14)

OpposedDaniel TobiasSep 14, 2026

Delivered a sarcastic speech mocking the city's Flock license plate reader contracts and surveillance policing.

City Council — September 14, 2026 · 11:08 →
OpposedB ChambersSep 14, 2026

A Sixth District LGBTQ resident warned that plate reader data could be repurposed against vulnerable communities, citing a police audit finding of improper federal data sharing, and urged a ban on the cameras.

City Council — September 14, 2026 · 14:43 →
OpposedMichael WeishMay 11, 2026

A 5th District resident called for all Flock funding to cease, citing Flock executives' misuse of another community's cameras, and asked for better pedestrian crossings.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 32:03 →
OpposedWilliam AllmanMay 11, 2026

A retired accountant warned Flock litigation elsewhere could cost Richmond millions and disrupt city cash flow, listing suits filed since April.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 34:49 →
OpposedNicole YaquimMay 11, 2026

A 2nd District resident argued Flock cameras are easily hackable and disproportionately surveil low-income, non-white neighborhoods.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 37:47 →
OpposedCameron ConserverMay 11, 2026

A 6th District resident cited documented misuse in Milwaukee and Mountain View and a Richmond officer sharing data with a federal agent, urging rejection of Flock funding.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 41:35 →
OpposedJack DimensMay 11, 2026

A 5th District resident said warrantless license plate tracking violates privacy and cited the state crime commission report on law enforcement data-sharing violations.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 44:26 →
OpposedMary DonahueMay 11, 2026

A 7th District resident delivered a poem urging the city to follow Charlottesville and Staunton in ending Flock contracts.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 44:34 →
OpposedB ChambersMay 11, 2026

A 6th District resident said surveillance dollars should go to housing, schools and youth programs, and that cameras follow lines of race and historic redlining.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 46:22 →
OpposedAnnalie VolkerMay 11, 2026

A 3rd District resident said Flock data is being improperly shared despite assurances, and the money should fund proven street safety instead.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 48:36 →
OpposedPatrick HanlanMay 11, 2026

A 1st District resident detailed RPD's documented Flock data breaches with ATF and ICE queries and said the contract is a liability that should be cut immediately.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 50:30 →
OpposedEmily GrimesMay 11, 2026

A 7th District resident said ICE access to Flock data is unavoidable once the data exists, and called out officials for funding an increase.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 1:10:31 →
OpposedJohanse WhitakerMay 11, 2026

A minister and Southerners on New Ground organizer argued for prevention-based safety investments over corporate surveillance.

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 1:14:30 →
OpposedEric VentoMay 11, 2026

A 4th District homeowner said mass surveillance is incompatible with liberty and the cameras 'have to come down.'

City Council — May 11, 2026 · 1:17:55 →